I used to be considerably disenchanted when the Undergraduate Senate (UGS) declined to undertake the C-12’s well-considered Honor Code revisions, which might have allowed examination proctoring below the auspices of a examine. As a five-time TA throughout three departments, I personally see no worth to the Honor Code’s prohibition on proctoring. However my disappointment with the UGS was dwarfed by my dismay on the School Senate’s unilateral motion invoking the “nuclear possibility,” seizing full management over the Honor Code for itself and enacting an outright reversal of the proctoring prohibition quite than the C-12’s beneficial examine on proctoring.
Previous to the School Senate’s extraordinary motion, judicial amendments required approval from the UGS, the Graduate Pupil Council, the School Senate and the College President to enter into impact. This collaborative and co-decisional course of between school and college students is uncommon and treasured amongst establishments of upper schooling. It displays a dedication to behave as collaborators within the broader educational undertaking that we as lecturers and learners partake in. College students ought to have the ability to belief when the College says scholar approval, by means of the UGS, is important for judicial amendments. Actually extraordinary circumstances that genuinely foreclose scholar enter ought to be required as justification for the unilateral nuclear possibility — and certainly, these circumstances don’t embrace the mere continuation of coverage that was initially permitted by the school and has been in place for a lot of a long time.
The Honor Code begins by noting that: “The Honor Code is an enterprise of the scholars, individually and collectively.” It’s the college students’ particular person and collective enterprise that offers the Honor Code extra ethical authority, and imposes on college students extra ethical accountability, than corresponding insurance policies at different universities. The School Senate’s motion abandons this precept and transforms the Honor Code into an imposition of the school.
Stanford can do higher, and has performed higher, than this. After I was a part of a six-student staff tasked by the Provost to analysis and suggest enhancements to Stanford’s inside grievance processes, I had the honour of working with Stanford directors and college who grappled thoughtfully and intentionally with tough institutional design questions, although it might have been simpler to easily impose modifications by means of administrative fiat. The School Senate ought to take into account taking the identical considerate and deliberative strategy, quite than rashly jettisoning a long time of shared governance.
And if, as supporters of the School Senate’s motion acknowledge, “a lot dishonest occurs in settings apart from in-class exams,” that are unaffected by proctoring, it turns into much more essential for the school to take care of a trusting and collaborative working relationship with college students to deal with dishonest in these settings as effectively. Proctoring alone shouldn’t be a panacea for essentially the most important Honor Code points, and mutual belief might be crucial for sustained progress.
If the School Senate believes (as I do) after dialogue and consideration that the UGS’s refusal to undertake the C-12’s suggestions was incorrect, it ought to have requested that the UGS submit the problem to a referendum or in any other case sought evaluation from the scholar physique. The train of the School Senate’s extraordinary powers to strip the UGS of co-decisional authority over the Honor Code was a grossly coercive and illegitimate response to the UGS’s vote, and leaves a bitter style in my mouth within the final quarter of my 5 years at Stanford. Within the spirit of collaboration and shared governance, I urge the School Senate to rescind its unilateral choice and reaffirm the valuable co-governance ideas that foster faculty-student collaboration. And if the School Senate does its half, the UGS ought to too: voting to permit a examine on proctoring will present the UGS’s honest dedication to responsibly train its personal shared governance features.
Kevin Li ’22 is a coterminal grasp’s scholar in public coverage in his fifth 12 months at Stanford. He beforehand served because the student-at-large member of The Day by day’s Board of Administrators.